![]() That’s all it does, and its designers are happy to admit it. Layout is a determinedly simple app - choose your pictures, choose your layout, and make a few quick adjustments. It doesn’t need to, though, considering the popularity of slightly more complicated collage apps such as Diptic. It’s polished, intuitive, and I like how it simplifies controls for resizing and mirroring, but it doesn’t showcase any breakthrough technology. I’d argue that photo collages are more mainstream than slow-motion videos, and Layout seems to lack the impressive technical feats of Hyperlapse. It’s fun, it’s simple and it gives you a new way to flex your creativity.Īfter Hyperlapse, Instagram continues to build dedicated utilities without cluttering the main Instagram experience (which has already gotten more complex over the years). Today we’re announcing Layout from Instagram, a new app that lets you easily combine multiple photos into a single image. ![]() I don’t think there’s any hope for the Gotham filter returning, but I’m optimistic that Instagram for iPad has to be around the corner.Fun new app by Instagram, designed to create photo collages. I would love to sit and browse photos and videos on Instagram for iPad in a dense layout with native resolution like that. This awesome concept by Parker Ortolani is another excellent example of how Instagram could adapt its iPhone app for the iPad without losing visual fidelity on the big screen. If so, that’s a problem that could easily be designed around! Instagram could ship a grid of photos and even mix ads in between! Bigger screen, more ads! That’s my best pitch to Instagram. You should remove instagram, delete Facebook, and stop seeking the constant affirmation of others. I don’t know, that might be a legacy argument now. This, but as a real app, would be better than what we have now There’s a better wayĪnother argument against Instagram for iPad is that it’s a legacy technology problem: the quality of photos may be too low to properly present on a tablet display. You can also run the iPhone version in a comically letterboxed window or scale it up at the cost of resolution fidelity, but there’s no landscape support and many iPads are attached to keyboards now. It’s okay, but native apps can simply do more. One argument is that the “progressive web app” on Instagram’s website is good enough if you save it to your Home screen. ![]() Instagram killed the market for iPad app alternatives without making its own. Retro for Instagram was a great solution, for example, but Instagram changed its API that gave developers access to the service in their apps. The lack of a dedicated Instagram for iPad app used to be an opportunity for developers. Switch to Layout even if you don’t want to post to Instagram.) Instagram killed iPad apps I see a lot of people use free, ad-supported alternatives with watermarks over the collage. (Instagram’s Layout app is also really nice. Facebook does a semi-okay job or supporting Facebook and Messenger on the iPad, and Instagram even made two iPad camera apps - Hyperlapse and Boomerang - just not, you know, the main app. And IGTV was a dud, but a tablet version would have been neat if it wasn’t!įacebook and Instagram know the iPad exists. Instagram Stories are even delightful (despite being ripped off from Snapchat). Instagram is fantastic for sharing our favorite photos and videos, and iPads are wonderful for appreciating both. As 2023 rolls in, the refusal to make an iPad version that isn’t just the web remains a head scratcher. Instagram is also an twelve-year-old iPhone app - it launched the same year as the iPad. ![]() Despite Meta’s best efforts to tank it, Instagram has remained a population destination away from Facebook and Twitter. There’s something about the constraints of mostly photo and video sharing that just feels healthier. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |